|
locked
Re: Should messages on the NCDEA Network be private or public?
#poll
I concur with Craig.
Thank you.
Monte Marti
District Manager
Snohomish Conservation District
monte@...
425-377-7001
425-359-3085 (cell)
http://snohomishcd.org/
www.betterground.org
or
I concur with Craig.
Thank you.
Monte Marti
District Manager
Snohomish Conservation District
monte@...
425-377-7001
425-359-3085 (cell)
http://snohomishcd.org/
www.betterground.org
or
|
By
Monte Marti
·
#21
·
|
|
locked
Re: Should messages on the NCDEA Network be private or public?
#poll
Agreed!
--
Gretchen Rank
Southwest Representative for NCDEA
ncdea.org
Agreed!
--
Gretchen Rank
Southwest Representative for NCDEA
ncdea.org
|
By
Gretchen Rank
·
#22
·
|
|
locked
Re: Should messages on the NCDEA Network be private or public?
#poll
Hey folks, I'm going to lock this poll a week from today, so by Friday, February 15, no more poll responses will be accepted.
For those who haven't weighed in, please do so. Or comment on the poll.
Hey folks, I'm going to lock this poll a week from today, so by Friday, February 15, no more poll responses will be accepted.
For those who haven't weighed in, please do so. Or comment on the poll.
|
By
Pacific NCDEA
·
#23
·
|
|
Comments about the 2019 NACD annual meeting?
Hi folks. For those who attended the NACD meeting in San Antonio, do you have comments or feedback about the meeting? This would help those of us who work directly with NACD on developing and
Hi folks. For those who attended the NACD meeting in San Antonio, do you have comments or feedback about the meeting? This would help those of us who work directly with NACD on developing and
|
By
Pacific NCDEA
·
#24
·
Edited
|
|
locked
Re: Should messages on the NCDEA Network be private or public?
#poll
The NCDEA Network will remain viewable by non-members.
In addition to the publicly posted comments, I also received several individual emails. Every one of those individual emails was in favor of
The NCDEA Network will remain viewable by non-members.
In addition to the publicly posted comments, I also received several individual emails. Every one of those individual emails was in favor of
|
By
Pacific NCDEA
·
#25
·
|
|
Question of the week: state-level sub-groups for the NCDEA Network?
Here's a question of the week for your consideration: should we create state-level sub-groups in the NCDEA Network if so requested by a state? Would a state-level discussion network be useful to
Here's a question of the week for your consideration: should we create state-level sub-groups in the NCDEA Network if so requested by a state? Would a state-level discussion network be useful to
|
By
Pacific NCDEA
·
#26
·
|
|
Re: Question of the week: state-level sub-groups for the NCDEA Network?
I'm personally ambivalent about this topic. I see benefits of having state specific topics as there could be conversations in one state that really don't apply elsewhere. However, having a topic
I'm personally ambivalent about this topic. I see benefits of having state specific topics as there could be conversations in one state that really don't apply elsewhere. However, having a topic
|
By
Craig Nelson
·
#27
·
|
|
Re: Question of the week: state-level sub-groups for the NCDEA Network?
I concur with Craig's thoughts/comments.
Thank you.
Monte Marti
District Manager
Snohomish Conservation District
monte@...
425-377-7001
425-359-3085
I concur with Craig's thoughts/comments.
Thank you.
Monte Marti
District Manager
Snohomish Conservation District
monte@...
425-377-7001
425-359-3085
|
By
Monte Marti
·
#28
·
|
|
Re: Question of the week: state-level sub-groups for the NCDEA Network?
I feel if we are going to give our audience what they want, then yes we should "if so requested".
Perhaps in doing so they can have the option of making the group and/or individual topics public or
I feel if we are going to give our audience what they want, then yes we should "if so requested".
Perhaps in doing so they can have the option of making the group and/or individual topics public or
|
By
Tim Riley
·
#29
·
|
|
Re: Question of the week: state-level sub-groups for the NCDEA Network?
If attending UW will help me to remember the definition of words like "ambivalent" without having to look ask Google, then I buy in to your theory that UW is the better school. This hypothesis is
If attending UW will help me to remember the definition of words like "ambivalent" without having to look ask Google, then I buy in to your theory that UW is the better school. This hypothesis is
|
By
Tim Riley
·
#30
·
|
|
Re: Question of the week: state-level sub-groups for the NCDEA Network?
I think this is one of the questions I'd like to discuss at CONNECT in a few weeks.
"What forum is best for Oregon SWCD DMs to keep in touch with one another on a consistent/as-needed basis?"
If the
I think this is one of the questions I'd like to discuss at CONNECT in a few weeks.
"What forum is best for Oregon SWCD DMs to keep in touch with one another on a consistent/as-needed basis?"
If the
|
By
Jay Udelhoven
·
#31
·
|
|
Send us your spring conservation photos!
We would love to feature photos of your conservation projects and conservation district employees on the NCDEA website. The best photos will end up being used as a monthly website background. For
We would love to feature photos of your conservation projects and conservation district employees on the NCDEA website. The best photos will end up being used as a monthly website background. For
|
By
Pacific NCDEA
·
#32
·
|
|
Awesomeness in South Dakota!
Who is going to this awesome #training opportunity in South Dakota?
Link: https://www.facebook.com/MYNCDEA/posts/2672921229445578
Your Northern Plains Region Director and North-Central Region Director
Who is going to this awesome #training opportunity in South Dakota?
Link: https://www.facebook.com/MYNCDEA/posts/2672921229445578
Your Northern Plains Region Director and North-Central Region Director
|
By
Pacific NCDEA
·
#33
·
|
|
NACD summer meeting in Santa Fe: who is going?
Save the Date: The 2019 NACD Summer Conservation Forum and Tour will be held in Santa Fe, N.M., Aug. 2 – 6, 2019 at the Drury Plaza Hotel in conjunction with the Southwest and Pacific Regions
Save the Date: The 2019 NACD Summer Conservation Forum and Tour will be held in Santa Fe, N.M., Aug. 2 – 6, 2019 at the Drury Plaza Hotel in conjunction with the Southwest and Pacific Regions
|
By
Tom Salzer <tsalzer@...>
·
#34
·
|
|
Re: NACD summer meeting in Santa Fe: who is going?
I will not be able to attend. Thanks for the note/reminder.
Thank you.
Monte Marti
District Manager
Snohomish Conservation District
monte@...
425-377-7001
425-359-3085
I will not be able to attend. Thanks for the note/reminder.
Thank you.
Monte Marti
District Manager
Snohomish Conservation District
monte@...
425-377-7001
425-359-3085
|
By
Monte Marti
·
#35
·
|
|
Re: NACD summer meeting in Santa Fe: who is going?
I will be attending.
--
Gretchen Rank
Southwest Director for NCDEA
ncdea.us
I will be attending.
--
Gretchen Rank
Southwest Director for NCDEA
ncdea.us
|
By
Gretchen Rank
·
#36
·
|
|
Re: NACD summer meeting in Santa Fe: who is going?
I'm not sure of the exact days I will be there yet, but I do plan to attend.
Tim Riley
NCDEA Past President
I'm not sure of the exact days I will be there yet, but I do plan to attend.
Tim Riley
NCDEA Past President
|
By
Tim Riley
·
#37
·
|
|
Non Co-Located District Offices
For anyone that is in a District office that is not co-located with USDA; do you have a written agreement with your local and/or state USDA-NRCS to coordinate your operations and/or solidify a
For anyone that is in a District office that is not co-located with USDA; do you have a written agreement with your local and/or state USDA-NRCS to coordinate your operations and/or solidify a
|
By
Tim Riley
·
#38
·
|
|
Re: NACD summer meeting in Santa Fe: who is going?
Excellent! We'll be well represented :-)
--
Tom Salzer, Pacific Region Director, NCDEA
pacificrep@...
Excellent! We'll be well represented :-)
--
Tom Salzer, Pacific Region Director, NCDEA
pacificrep@...
|
By
Pacific NCDEA
·
#39
·
|
|
Re: Non Co-Located District Offices
Tim, I'll reach out to Washington State with your question. Most of their districts are no longer co-located with USDA. I haven't heard of such an agreement but I surely do like the idea!
Tom
--
Tim, I'll reach out to Washington State with your question. Most of their districts are no longer co-located with USDA. I haven't heard of such an agreement but I surely do like the idea!
Tom
--
|
By
Pacific NCDEA
·
#40
·
|